i7-1255U vs Atom S1260
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-1255U outperforms Atom S1260 by a whopping 2464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3093 | 897 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-M |
| Power efficiency | 3.49 | 53.75 |
| Architecture codename | Centerton (2012) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| Release date | 11 December 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 February 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1283 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 20 |
| PCI support | PCI Support | no data |
| UART | UART | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 8.46 |
| Recency | 11 December 2012 | 23 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom S1260 has 87.5% lower power consumption.
i7-1255U, on the other hand, has a 2463.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 400% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i7-1255U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom S1260 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom S1260 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-1255U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom S1260 and Core i7-1255U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
