EPYC 8024PN vs Atom S1240
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Centerton (2012) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 11 December 2012 (12 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $525 |
Detailed specifications
Atom S1240 and EPYC 8024PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,875 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom S1240 and EPYC 8024PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1283 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.1 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom S1240 and EPYC 8024PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom S1240 and EPYC 8024PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom S1240 and EPYC 8024PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom S1240 and EPYC 8024PN.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 96 |
| PCI support | PCI Support | no data |
| UART | UART | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 December 2012 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 80 Watt |
Atom S1240 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8024PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom S1240 and AMD EPYC 8024PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
