Xeon 6960E+ vs Atom P5362

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1013not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.31no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.00no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSnow Ridge (2020−2022)Clearwater Forest (2026)
Release date6 June 2022 (4 years ago)31 May 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$708no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)144
Threads24144
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB (per module)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache27 MB432 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA21067529
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes3296
USB revision2.0, 3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART3no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2022 31 May 2026
Physical cores 24 144
Threads 24 144
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 330 Watt

Atom P5362 has 298% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6960E+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom P5362 and Intel Xeon 6960E+. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom P5362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6960E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom P5362 and Xeon 6960E+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.