EPYC 9256 vs Atom P5362

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1018not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.14no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.03no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSnow Ridge (2020−2022)Venice (2004−2026)
Release date6 June 2022 (4 years ago)23 July 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$708$2,501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache27 MB96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm2 nm
Die sizeno data8x 76 mm2
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA2106SP8
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256.

PCIe version3.06.0
PCI Express lanes32128
USB revision2.0, 3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART3no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2022 23 July 2026
Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 10 nm 2 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 190 Watt

Atom P5362 has 129% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9256, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom P5362 and AMD EPYC 9256. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom P5362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom P5362 and EPYC 9256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.