EPYC 7773X vs Atom N570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Milan-X (2022)
Release date1 March 2011 (13 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$495 (5.8x MSRP)$1950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support666 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size87 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors176 Million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP3
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N570 341
EPYC 7773X 91491
+26730%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Atom N570 by 26730% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N570 82
EPYC 7773X 1496
+1724%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Atom N570 by 1724% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom N570 217
EPYC 7773X 14825
+6732%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Atom N570 by 6732% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2011 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 280 Watt

Atom N570 has 3400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N570 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N570 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N570
Atom N570
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 110 votes

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N570 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.