A8-7680 vs Atom N570
Aggregate performance score
A8-7680 outperforms Atom N570 by a whopping 876% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3602 | 2253 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 15.78 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD A8 |
| Power efficiency | 0.97 | 1.89 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Excavator (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 1 March 2011 (15 years ago) | 26 October 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $56 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom N570 and A8-7680: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 666 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N570 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N570 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N570 and A8-7680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N570 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N570 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 3150 | Radeon R7 Series |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 2.05 |
| Recency | 1 March 2011 | 26 October 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 45 Watt |
Atom N570 has 463% lower power consumption.
A8-7680, on the other hand, has a 876% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 61% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD A8-7680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N570 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom N570 is a notebook processor while A8-7680 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
