Xeon 6737P vs Atom N475
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6737P outperforms Atom N475 by a whopping 45400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3694 | 74 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.57 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.60 | 7.11 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 1 June 2010 (15 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $4,995 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 144 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 598 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 82 °C |
| Number of transistors | 123 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 3150 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N475 and Xeon 6737P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.10 | 45.50 |
| Recency | 1 June 2010 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 270 Watt |
Atom N475 has 4400% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6737P, on the other hand, has a 45400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6737P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N475 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom N475 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6737P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
