Xeon Gold 6438Y+ vs Atom N470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N470
2010, $75
1 core / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.13
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023, $3,141
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
35.53
+27231%

Xeon Gold 6438Y+ outperforms Atom N470 by a whopping 27231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3612114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data18.58
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 March 2010 (15 years ago)10 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$3,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.83 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB60 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors123 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA5594677
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom N470 0.13
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ 35.53
+27231%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom N470 224
Samples: 11
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ 62660
+27873%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 35.53
Recency 1 March 2010 10 January 2023
Physical cores 1 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 205 Watt

Atom N470 has 3316.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6438Y+, on the other hand, has a 27230.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom N470 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N470
Atom N470
Intel Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Xeon Gold 6438Y+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6438Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N470 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.