A6-9220e vs Atom N470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N470 and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiencyno data9.78
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N470 and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.83 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size66 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors123 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N470 and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559BGA
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N470 and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Virtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N470 and A6-9220e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N470 and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N470 and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N470 224
A6-9220e 977
+336%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N470 600
A6-9220e 1056
+76%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N470 930
A6-9220e 1741
+87.2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N470 106.7
A6-9220e 35.2
+203%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2010 1 June 2017
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm

A6-9220e has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N470 and A6-9220e. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N470 and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N470
Atom N470
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 315 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N470 or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.