Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Atom N450

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2836
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data0.57
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date21 December 2009 (14 years ago)September 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size66 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559AM2
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N450 203
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 851
+319%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N450 72
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 253
+251%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N450 114
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 442
+288%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 89 Watt

Atom N450 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1680% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5200+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N450 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N450
Atom N450
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 174 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 311 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N450 or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.