Celeron N4020C vs Atom N2850
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2428 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6,6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 1 January 2021 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
Atom N2850 has 100% more threads.
Celeron N4020C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2850 and Celeron N4020C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
