Ryzen 7 2700X vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated698
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data9.94
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size66 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors176 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4.88 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2800 444
Ryzen 7 2700X 17517
+3845%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N2800 648
Ryzen 7 2700X 5256
+711%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N2800 1829
Ryzen 7 2700X 34763
+1801%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N2800 965
Ryzen 7 2700X 10643
+1003%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N2800 54.3
Ryzen 7 2700X 3.48
+1460%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom N2800 0.1
Ryzen 7 2700X 10.6
+21100%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Atom N2800 4
Ryzen 7 2700X 105
+2747%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Atom N2800 20
Ryzen 7 2700X 227
+1051%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom N2800 625
Ryzen 7 2700X 4779
+665%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 13 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 105 Watt

Atom N2800 has 1650% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 103 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2887 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.