GX-210JA vs Atom N2800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N2800
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.28
+75%
GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16

Atom N2800 outperforms GX-210JA by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31293301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD
Power efficiency3.772.51
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Temash (2013)
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and GX-210JA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size4.88 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N2800 0.28
+75%
GX-210JA 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2800 444
+79%
GX-210JA 248

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.16
Recency 1 December 2011 23 May 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

Atom N2800 has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Atom N2800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 104 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.