Xeon Platinum 8470 vs Atom N280
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8470 outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 56889% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3695 | 50 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.53 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.52 | 6.19 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | DiamondVille (2008−2009) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 February 2009 (17 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,359 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 52 |
| Threads | 2 | 104 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.07 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 666.66 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 105 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 25.9638 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.1625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | PBGA437 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2.5 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N280 and Xeon Platinum 8470.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.09 | 51.29 |
| Recency | 1 February 2009 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 52 |
| Threads | 2 | 104 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 350 Watt |
Atom N280 has 17400% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8470, on the other hand, has a 56888.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 5100% more physical cores and 5100% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N280 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom N280 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8470 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
