i3-4100E vs Atom N280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N280
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09
Core i3-4100E
2013, $225
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.05
+1067%

Core i3-4100E outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 1067% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking37012688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.521.20
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 February 2009 (17 years ago)4 September 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate666.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Million1,400 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437Intel BGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 900 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom N280 0.09
i3-4100E 1.05
+1067%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom N280 157
Samples: 52
i3-4100E 1848
+1077%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.09 1.05
Recency 1 February 2009 4 September 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 37 Watt

Atom N280 has 1750% lower power consumption.

i3-4100E, on the other hand, has a 1066.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i3-4100E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N280 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N280
Atom N280
Intel Core i3-4100E
Core i3-4100E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 62 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Core i3-4100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N280 and Core i3-4100E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.