EPYC 7371 vs Atom N270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N270
2008, $44
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08
EPYC 7371
2018, $1,550
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
17.23
+21438%

EPYC 7371 outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 21438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3722454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.93
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.354.28
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date2 April 2008 (18 years ago)16 November 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44$1,550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1231
L1 cache56 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPBGA437TR4
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom N270 and EPYC 7371 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and EPYC 7371.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom N270 0.08
EPYC 7371 17.23
+21438%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom N270 136
Samples: 239
EPYC 7371 30830
+22569%
Samples: 15

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 17.23
Recency 2 April 2008 16 November 2018
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 170 Watt

Atom N270 has 8400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has a 21438% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N270 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 292 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N270 and EPYC 7371, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.