i9-9900KF vs Atom N270

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Core i9
Power efficiencyno data11.46
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44$488

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeFSBDMI 3.0
Bus rate533.33 MT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N270 136
i9-9900KF 18266
+13331%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 7 January 2019
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 95 Watt

Atom N270 has 4650% lower power consumption.

i9-9900KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while Core i9-9900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Core i9-9900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
Intel Core i9-9900KF
Core i9-9900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 225 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 501 vote

Rate Core i9-9900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or Core i9-9900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.