Celeron M ULV 723 vs Atom N270

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.41no data
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)no data
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHzno data
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625V1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 1 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 10 Watt

Atom N270 has 400% lower power consumption.

Celeron M ULV 723, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Celeron M ULV 723, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
Intel Celeron M ULV 723
Celeron M ULV 723

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 723 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or Celeron M ULV 723, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.