Celeron 787 vs Atom N270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3695not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.35no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)1 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44$107

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeFSBDMI 2.0
Bus rate533.33 MT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1213
L1 cache56 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Million504 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-950 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N270 and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVO-+
CRT-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and Celeron 787.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 1 July 2011
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 17 Watt

Atom N270 has 100% more threads, and 750% lower power consumption.

Celeron 787, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom N270 and Intel Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 270 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom N270 and Celeron 787, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.