Processor 300 vs Atom N2650
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2650 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1312 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.36 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (13 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $82 |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2650 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 163 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2650 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3,6 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2650 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom N2650 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2650 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2650 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2650 and Processor 300.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 8 January 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 46 Watt |
Atom N2650 has 1433.3% lower power consumption.
Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2650 and Processor 300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom N2650 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2650 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
