Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Atom E680T
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Pinnacle Ridge (2019) |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (15 years ago) | 11 October 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $85 |
Detailed specifications
Atom E680T and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E680T and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680T and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E680T and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680T and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E680T and Ryzen 5 1600AF.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 September 2010 | 11 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 65 Watt |
Atom E680T has 1525% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 1600AF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom E680T and AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E680T is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
