Ultra 7 265KF vs Atom E680T

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated82
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data28.25
Architecture codenameTunnel Creek (2010)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date14 September 2010 (14 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size26 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors47 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 6761851
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 600N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 September 2010 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

Atom E680T has 3025% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 1900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom E680T is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E680T and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E680T
Atom E680T
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E680T or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.