Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Atom E680
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 outperforms Atom E680 by a whopping 8292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3748 | 930 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.35 | 16.14 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (16 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom E680 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 480 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E680 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 | AMD Radeon 840M ( - 2800 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.13 | 10.91 |
| Recency | 14 September 2010 | 5 January 2026 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 28 Watt |
Atom E680 has 600% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, on the other hand, has a 8292% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E680 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
