Xeon Gold 5415+ vs Atom E665C
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 527 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.76 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.98 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Stellarton (2010) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 22 November 2010 (14 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,076 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 22.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1466 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5-4400 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E665C and Xeon Gold 5415+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 November 2010 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 150 Watt |
Atom E665C has 3650% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5415+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom E665C and Intel Xeon Gold 5415+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E665C is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5415+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
