Ryzen 7 8700F vs Atom E665C

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.45
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Architecture codenameStellarton (2010)Phoenix
Release date22 November 2010 (13 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Current priceno data$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size26 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors47 million25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1466AM5
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 600N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2010 1 April 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom E665C is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E665C and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E665C
Atom E665C
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Atom E665C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E665C or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.