Athlon X2 4850e vs Atom E660
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3590 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 2.11 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (15 years ago) | March 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom E660 and Athlon X2 4850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E660 and Athlon X2 4850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E660 and Athlon X2 4850e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E660 and Athlon X2 4850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 45 Watt |
Atom E660 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.
Athlon X2 4850e, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom E660 and AMD Athlon X2 4850e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E660 is a notebook processor while Athlon X2 4850e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
