Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Atom E645CT
Primary details
Comparing Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 196 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 42.05 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.86 |
| Architecture codename | Stellarton (2010) | Granite Ridge (2024) |
| Release date | 22 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 7 November 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $479 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | 8,315 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1466 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel GMA 600 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 November 2010 | 7 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 120 Watt |
Atom E645CT has 2900% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 9800X3D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E645CT is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E645CT and Ryzen 7 9800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
