Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Atom E645C
Primary details
Comparing Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 32 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 21.74 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Architecture codename | Stellarton (2010) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| Release date | 22 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $2220 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1466 | WRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 November 2010 | 8 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 280 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E645C is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E645C and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
