Xeon 6746E vs Atom E3815
Primary details
Comparing Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | $5,929 |
Detailed specifications
Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 112 |
| Threads | 1 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | 4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 112 |
| Threads | 1 | 112 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 250 Watt |
Atom E3815 has 4900% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6746E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 11100% more physical cores and 11100% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E3815 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6746E is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3815 and Xeon 6746E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
