Celeron M 390 vs Atom D510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D510
2009
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.26
+36.8%
Celeron M 390
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.19

Atom D510 outperforms Celeron M 390 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D510 and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31443241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.890.86
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date21 December 2009 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D510 and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Atom D510 and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D510 and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom D510 and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D510 and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D510 and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.19
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 21 Watt

Atom D510 has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The Atom D510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 390 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D510 and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D510
Atom D510
Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 52 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D510 or Celeron M 390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.