Xeon Gold 5218R vs Atom D410
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5218R outperforms Atom D410 by a whopping 14180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3685 | 596 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.26 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | 4.82 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 4 January 2010 (16 years ago) | 24 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $636 | $1,273 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 20 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 27.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 87 °C |
| Number of transistors | 123 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 3150 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D410 and Xeon Gold 5218R.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.10 | 14.28 |
| Recency | 4 January 2010 | 24 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 20 |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
Atom D410 has 1150% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5218R, on the other hand, has a 14180% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5218R is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D410 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom D410 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5218R is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
