Xeon w9-3595X vs Atom D2700

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3107	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	20.19
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Atom	no data
Power efficiency	2.74	15.30
Architecture codename	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date	1 November 2011 (13 years ago)	24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$52	$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads	4	120
Base clock speed	2.13 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	0.13 GHz	4.8 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	112.5 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	66 mm2	4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	81 °C
Number of transistors	176 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA559	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	-	+
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
AMT	-	no data
HD Audio	+	no data
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	-	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	4 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	1	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)

N/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	4	112
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.29	62.25
Recency	1 November 2011	24 August 2024
Physical cores	2	60
Threads	4	120
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	385 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---