Microsoft SQ1 vs Atom CE4130
Primary details
Comparing Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Architecture codename | Sodaville (2009) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 96 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 951 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 September 2009 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Atom CE4130 has 42757.1% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom CE4130 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
