Xeon E-2336 vs Atom C3958

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.77
Xeon E-2336
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.84
+291%

Xeon E-2336 outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1612671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.596.01
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)8 September 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449no data
Current price$740 (1.6x MSRP)$2583

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2336 has 919% better value for money than Atom C3958.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPXno data+
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3958 2.77
Xeon E-2336 10.84
+291%

Xeon E-2336 outperforms Atom C3958 by 291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3958 4281
Xeon E-2336 16768
+292%

Xeon E-2336 outperforms Atom C3958 by 292% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.77 10.84
Recency 15 August 2017 8 September 2021
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E-2336 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3958 and Xeon E-2336, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958
Intel Xeon E-2336
Xeon E-2336

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon E-2336 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3958 or Xeon E-2336, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.