i5-12600KF vs Atom C3958

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.57
Core i5-12600KF
2021
10 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
18.24
+610%

Core i5-12600KF outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 610% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1744350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5848.92
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Core i5
Power efficiency7.5613.31
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)27 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449$264

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-12600KF has 8334% better value for money than Atom C3958.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2037
L1 cache896 KB384 KB
L2 cache16 MB9.5 MB
L3 cache16 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF.

PCIe version35.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3958 2.57
i5-12600KF 18.24
+610%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3958 3929
i5-12600KF 27909
+610%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 18.24
Recency 15 August 2017 27 October 2021
Physical cores 16 10
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 125 Watt

Atom C3958 has 60% more physical cores, and 303.2% lower power consumption.

i5-12600KF, on the other hand, has a 609.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Core i5-12600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3958 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-12600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3958 and Core i5-12600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Core i5-12600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1728 votes

Rate Core i5-12600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3958 or Core i5-12600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.