EPYC 7532 vs Atom C3955

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3955
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 32 Watt
3.30
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
29.01
+779%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Atom C3955 by a whopping 779% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1702186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.366.13
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)19 February 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier2124
L1 cache896 KB2 MB
L2 cache16 MB16 MB
L3 cache16 MB256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1310Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3955 3.30
EPYC 7532 29.01
+779%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3955 5803
EPYC 7532 50986
+779%
Samples: 45

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.30 29.01
Recency 15 August 2017 19 February 2020
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 200 Watt

Atom C3955 has 525% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 779.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3955 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 32 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3955 and EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.