Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Atom C3950

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated54
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.42
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data13.58
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)52
Threads16104
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache896 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes1680
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 16 52
Threads 16 104
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 300 Watt

Atom C3950 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 225% more physical cores and 550% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3950 and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3950
Atom C3950
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 17 votes

Rate Atom C3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3950 or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.