Xeon E-2314 vs Atom C3950

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data7.47
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes1644
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 8 September 2021
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 65 Watt

Atom C3950 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 170.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3950 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3950
Atom C3950
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 17 votes

Rate Atom C3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3950 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.