Xeon w7-3565X vs Atom C3858

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3858
2017
12 cores / 12 threads, 25 Watt
3.08
Xeon w7-3565X
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 335 Watt
50.08
+1526%

Xeon w7-3565X outperforms Atom C3858 by a whopping 1526% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking163635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0049.12
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency11.2313.63
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332$2,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-3565X has 4812% better value for money than Atom C3858.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache672 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB82.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt335 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes16112
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3858 3.08
Xeon w7-3565X 50.08
+1526%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3858 4707
Xeon w7-3565X 76649
+1528%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.08 50.08
Recency 15 August 2017 24 August 2024
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 12 64
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 335 Watt

Atom C3858 has 1240% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3565X, on the other hand, has a 1526% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3565X is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3858 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3858 and Xeon w7-3565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3858
Atom C3858
Intel Xeon w7-3565X
Xeon w7-3565X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Atom C3858 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3565X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3858 or Xeon w7-3565X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.