Ryzen 7 3780U vs Atom C3858

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3858
2017, $332
12 cores / 12 threads, 25 Watt
2.86
Ryzen 7 3780U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.24
+48.3%

Ryzen 7 3780U outperforms Atom C3858 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18581495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.37no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency4.8612.01
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)22 October 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier2023
L1 cache672 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1612
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3858 2.86
Ryzen 7 3780U 4.24
+48.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3858 5040
Samples: 3
Ryzen 7 3780U 7483
+48.5%
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 4.24
Recency 15 August 2017 22 October 2019
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3858 has 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 3780U, on the other hand, has a 48.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 3780U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3858 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3858 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 3780U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3858
Atom C3858
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U
Ryzen 7 3780U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Atom C3858 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 41 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3780U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3858 and Ryzen 7 3780U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.