EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Atom C3858

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1854not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.37no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency4.85no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.85 GHz
Multiplier2018.5
L1 cache672 KB1536 KB
L2 cache12 MB8 MB
L3 cache12 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size256 GB1 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 21 February 2018
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 12 16
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 85 Watt

Atom C3858 has 240% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3858 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3858
Atom C3858
AMD EPYC Embedded 3401
EPYC Embedded 3401

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Atom C3858 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate EPYC Embedded 3401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3858 and EPYC Embedded 3401, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.