EPYC 74F3 vs Atom C3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.84
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data6.09
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$323$2,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier2132
L1 cache672 KB1536 KB
L2 cache12 MB12 MB
L3 cache12 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1310SP3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes16128
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 12 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 240 Watt

Atom C3850 has 860% lower power consumption.

EPYC 74F3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3850 and AMD EPYC 74F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom C3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3850 and EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.