Xeon D-1718T vs Atom C3758

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.90
Xeon D-1718T
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 46 Watt
6.11
+111%

Xeon D-1718T outperforms Atom C3758 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16631092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.58no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency10.9212.50
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)no data
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache16 MB10 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB256 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revision33.0
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports1624
Number of USB ports84
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBE+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3758 2.90
Xeon D-1718T 6.11
+111%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3758 4614
Xeon D-1718T 9713
+111%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 6.11
Recency 15 August 2017 1 January 2022
Physical cores 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 46 Watt

Atom C3758 has 100% more physical cores, and 84% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1718T, on the other hand, has a 110.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon D-1718T is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3758 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and Xeon D-1718T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
Intel Xeon D-1718T
Xeon D-1718T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1718T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3758 or Xeon D-1718T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.