EPYC 7282 vs Atom C3758

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
3.02
EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
19.73
+553%

EPYC 7282 outperforms Atom C3758 by a whopping 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1634297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.8315.68
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$650

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7282 has 757% better value for money than Atom C3758.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier2228
L1 cache448 KB1 MB
L2 cache16 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310TR4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3758 3.02
EPYC 7282 19.73
+553%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3758 4614
EPYC 7282 30128
+553%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.02 19.73
Recency 15 August 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 120 Watt

Atom C3758 has 380% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7282, on the other hand, has a 553.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3758 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and EPYC 7282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 44 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3758 or EPYC 7282, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.