i5-13400E vs Atom C3758

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3758
2017, $193
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.74
Core i5-13400E
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.43
+463%

Core i5-13400E outperforms Atom C3758 by a whopping 463% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency4.6210.02
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache448 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA13101700
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 730

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3758 2.74
i5-13400E 15.43
+463%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3758 4803
Samples: 28
i5-13400E 27000
+462%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.74 15.43
Recency 15 August 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Atom C3758 has 160% lower power consumption.

i5-13400E, on the other hand, has a 463% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 25% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i5-13400E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3758 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400E is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate Core i5-13400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3758 and Core i5-13400E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.