Xeon Gold 6342 vs Atom C3558

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3558
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 16 Watt
1.57
Xeon Gold 6342
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 230 Watt
30.59
+1848%

Xeon Gold 6342 outperforms Atom C3558 by a whopping 1848% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2021122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5224.66
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$424 (4.9x MSRP)$2400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6342 has 4642% better value for money than Atom C3558.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °C81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt230 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes1264
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3558 1.57
Xeon Gold 6342 30.59
+1848%

Xeon Gold 6342 outperforms Atom C3558 by 1848% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3558 2426
Xeon Gold 6342 47320
+1851%

Xeon Gold 6342 outperforms Atom C3558 by 1851% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 30.59
Recency 15 August 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 230 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6342 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3558 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3558 and Xeon Gold 6342, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558
Intel Xeon Gold 6342
Xeon Gold 6342

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6342 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3558 or Xeon Gold 6342, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.