Xeon 6315P vs Atom C3558

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2200not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency9.05no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache224 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA13101700
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes1216
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 24 February 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 55 Watt

Atom C3558 has 243.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3558 and Intel Xeon 6315P. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558
Intel Xeon 6315P
Xeon 6315P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6315P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3558 and Xeon 6315P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.