Atom N280 vs C3558

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3558
2017, $86
4 cores / 4 threads, 16 Watt
1.39
+1444%

Atom C3558 outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 1444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24573710
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.671.52
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 February 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom C3558 and Atom N280: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data666.66 MT/s
Multiplier2210
L1 cache224 KB56 KB
L2 cache8 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data25.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3558 and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3558 and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Atom C3558 and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3558 and Atom N280 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3558 and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133no data
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3558 and Atom N280.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes12no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3558 1.39
+1444%
Atom N280 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3558 2431
+1448%
Samples: 16
Atom N280 157
Samples: 52

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 0.09
Recency 15 August 2017 1 February 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 2 Watt

Atom C3558 has a 1444% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N280, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

The Intel Atom C3558 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N280 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3558 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N280 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 63 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3558 and Atom N280, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.