Xeon Gold 6348 vs Atom C3538

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3538
2017, $75
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.09
Xeon Gold 6348
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 235 Watt
29.62
+2617%

Xeon Gold 6348 outperforms Atom C3538 by a whopping 2617% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2665196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.075.32
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)6 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB42 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt235 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes1264
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3538 1.09
Xeon Gold 6348 29.62
+2617%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3538 1910
Samples: 5
Xeon Gold 6348 51843
+2614%
Samples: 3

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom C3538 255
Xeon Gold 6348 1490
+484%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom C3538 895
Xeon Gold 6348 14816
+1555%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 29.62
Recency 15 August 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 235 Watt

Atom C3538 has 1467% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6348, on the other hand, has a 2617% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6348 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3538 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 19 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6348 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3538 and Xeon Gold 6348, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.