Xeon E3-1220L v3 vs Atom C3538

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads
1.22
+34.1%
Xeon E3-1220L v3
2013
2 cores / 4 threads
0.91

Atom C3538 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22082403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.050.07
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Haswell-WS (2013)
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)2 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data
Current price$3784 (50.5x MSRP)$149

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1220L v3 has 40% better value for money than Atom C3538.

Detailed Specifications

Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB4096 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protectionno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1216
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3538 1.22
+34.1%
Xeon E3-1220L v3 0.91

Atom C3538 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3538 1889
+34.3%
Xeon E3-1220L v3 1407

Atom C3538 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.22 0.91
Recency 15 August 2017 2 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

The Atom C3538 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Xeon E3-1220L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
Xeon E3-1220L v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or Xeon E3-1220L v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.